« US Treasury Dept. Efforts Move Exchange Rate by 67%! Melamine in the Pet Food, Trade Talks and More | Main | Hold the Presses! FDA Stops Imports of Chinese Toothpaste »
May 22, 2007
US Treasury Secretary Critical of the Home Crowd, the new Trade Winds and more...
WSJ's article on Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson notes his frustration, not in dealing with Chinese officials, but with Americans. With respect to Social Security:
Mr. Paulson says it's "frustrating to be in an environment where well-meaning people on both sides of the aisle see there's a problem" but don't have the political will to act. "I've been asking people to come to the table, saying all options are on the table, and I'm getting a little tired of playing solitaire."
As to China, he appears to think that patience will, over time, result in the gains he is looking to achieve.
Under pressure to take a tougher stance, the administration has unilaterally imposed sanctions on China for alleged improper pricing of exports, and in a World Trade Organization complaint, has accused China of lax enforcement of copyright violations. Mr. Paulson didn't oppose the moves, although he knew it would be an obstacle to discussions, Treasury officials say. The Chinese reacted angrily, and Mr. Paulson spent about four hours on the phone with Ms. Wu to smooth over tensions, people familiar with the conversation say.
A quote verbatim would have been more revealing than this paraphrase. Did Mr. Paulson really say that the WTO IP complaint was an obstacle to his discussions with China? Isn't it, instead, a valuable tool of negotiation with China? The article thus leaves the reader wondering about his priorities and methods.
UPDATE (May 24, 2007): Chinese authorities have proven as incapable of restraining its prolific counterfeiting as American federal departments were of providing humanitarian assistance during hurricane Katrina.
On Tuesday, Ms. Wu said that efforts by some to “politicize” the Chinese-American relationship were “absolutely unacceptable.” This was taken as a reference to the American challenges to Chinese subsidies of exports and piracy of DVDs.
IP is precisely the kind of issue that the U.S. can not let go of. US representatives in China have been banging away on IP -- with words alone -- for at least 4 years, but it is chopping a redwood with an invisible axe.
The hot air -- the new Trade Winds? -- that has blown forth and back between these two Great Nations has accomplished scant little over these many years.
Action -- even if it is only symbolic -- will speak far louder. [Symbolic acts are typical of Chinese political tradition, e.g. to disarm an enemy by executing the leaders of the group and not the entire group itself.]
Susan C. Schwab, the United States trade representative, speaking at the conclusion of the talks Wednesday, made it clear that her own session with Chinese leaders had done little to narrow differences on these issues. “Suffice it to say we had a healthy exchange of views,” she said.
Meaning that the banquet was terrific.
But this quote gives us serious gastric distress:
Mr. Paulson said he was impatient for more concrete results himself and hoped there would be further progress before the third session of the dialogue, in Beijing in December.
“I have no doubt that we’re getting more results than we would have without this dialogue,” he said.Everyone expects results. And therein lies the problem.
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)






